Merci de me suivre. Éphésiens 5 v.11. - LES TEXTES REFLÈTENT L'OPINION DES AUTEURS, n'impliquent ET n'engagent QUE CEUX-CI. Je rapporte les faits troublants qui me paraissent importants aujourd'hui. La religion fait les manchettes, et la Parole de Dieu est bafouée. J'ai choisi Jésus comme Maître de ma vie. J'attends son imminent retour, et veux observer ses Commandements (Exode 20 v.2-17). [Ép.5 v.11 : "NE PARTICIPEZ PAS AUX PRATIQUES STÉRILES QUE FAVORISENT LES TÉNÈBRES, MAIS DÉMASQUEZ-LES !"]
Ça s'est passé en Mars 2017... It's happened in March 2017...
Phantom suns in VietNam, March 2017
Planetary environmental chaos continued unabated this month. Several spectacular fireballs were seen from one end of the world to the other. Wildfires ravaged several mid-West states while unusually strong winds hit Illinois and New York. Madagascar got slammed by a ferocious storm as did Brazil, New Zealand and France. Severe flooding hit several parts of the globe, but the worst affected was Peru where dozens of people died and hundreds of thousands have been left with no homes. With freak tidal waves from Iran to South Africa, strange 'gas' explosions in the UK and methane gas leaks in Russia, not to mention snow off the coast of Africa and lightning scoring direct strikes on cars, March was a pretty intense month for the planet and its inhabitants.
Publiée le 7 avril 2017 (20:48) vo.eng ''SOTT - Earth Changes Summary - March 2017''
Publiée le 6 avril 2017 (33:45) vo.en ''Omega Watchman April 2017''
FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.
FAIR USE : This video contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an
effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections
106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by
reproduction in copies or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright.
Ça s'est passé en Février 2017... It's happened in February 2017...
Februrary 2017 continued
on as January started. Massive flooding in California due to "atmospheric
rivers" dumping large amounts of rain on coastal areas and snow on the
Sierra Nevada. The snow melt from this caused further flooding in Nevada. Eastern
Canada also experienced record snowfall, as did Iran, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan
and Japan.
Wildfires broke out in Eastern Australia and New Zealand while record rainfall
inundated Western Australia. Major flooding also hit several South American
nations including Chile, Peru and Colombia.
There are at least 30 active volcanoes around the world right now, including a
really impressive one in Guatemala. Massive earth cracks opened in Pakistan and
Italy.
These are just some of the chaotic events we present in this month's Sott
'Earth Changes' video compilation.
Publiée le 8 mars 2017 (24:39) vo.en ''SOTT- Earth Changes Summary - Februar 2017''
FAIR
USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up
video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video
and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and
106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in
copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are
HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their
copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill
of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct
violation of Fair Use Law.
Hillel Neuer of UN Watch just destroyed all those Muslim countries who claim Israel is an apartheid state. Bringing the facts, he silences the entire room.
How can Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other human rights abusing countries say Israel is an apartheid state? How does the UN allow this ? Countries which kill their own people are speaking out against the ONE DEMOCRACY in the Middle East. Doesn’t that sound twisted ?
Israel has 1.5 million Arabs living a life with full rights, being doctors and lawyers, being part of the knesset, and yet the countries speaking out against Israel have persecuted and expelled whatever Jews used to be living there.
As Neuer calls them out, he says “Where are your Jews ?” He asks where the REAL apartheid is.
Publiée le 21 mars 2017 (3:52) vo.en w. s-t.fr ''Algeria, where are your Jews? - Hillel Neuer at UNHRC's day against Israel''
Publiée le 7 avril 2015 (0:50) vo.en ''Jerusalem Jane : Muslims desecrate temple mount''
Publiée le 3 juin 2016 (8:30) vo.eg w. s-t.fr ''Islamologue Hamed Abdel-Samad analyse la haine de l'islam à l'égard des juifs''
Publiée le 15 juin 2015 (2:43) vo.en w. s-t.fr ''Mona Walter, Je ne respecte pas l'islam''
Publiée le 30 déc. 2015 (2:23) vo.en w. s-t.fr ''Témoignage de Mona Walter''
Publiée le 15 déc. 2014 (6:33) vo.mix. w. s-t. ''Palestine nazie de 1935 à 2014''
Publiée le 8 mars 2017 (4:24) vo.mix w. s-t. ''Evil never dies', it just changes its face''
Publiée le 29 déc. 2008 (5:58) vo.en w. s-t. ''The shocking video Muslims don't want you to see!!''
AJOUT du 12 mars 2017 :
Publiée le 15 fév. 2012 (11:23) vo.en w. s-t. ''Muslims attack Christians in America over sharia law''
After all...
Just days ago a Detroit judge awarded over $100,000 in attorney's fees in the case of a Christian, George Saieg, who was assaulted by Muslims, and then falsely accused and arrested by Dearborn police officers at the Arab Festival. Now a federal judge in Michigan has decided to allow another civil-rights claim against the city of Dearborn by four other Christians, who were also assaulted and arrested at the Arab festival, to move forward. The four were arrested by Dearborn police officers while speaking about their Christian faith to Muslims. The Christians spent the night in jail and were accused of "breaching the peace." However, all four won acquittals from a jury in a criminal trial.
After the trial, a 96-page civil rights lawsuit was filed against the city, Mayor John B. O'Reilly, Muslim Chief of Police Ronald Haddad, 17 police officers and two executives from the American Arab Chamber of Commerce. The plaintiffs are Acts 17 Apologetics, Nabeel Qureshi, David Wood, Paul Rezkalla and Josh Hogg all Christians who are featured in this video.
The judge's ruling is a huge victory for ALL Christians, and it allows the civil rights claims for the most egregious constitutional violations to proceed against the city and its corrupt officials. We are committed to ensuring that our Constitution and not Shariah law, which makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims, is the supreme law in this country. Source
AJOUT du 19 mars 2017 : Crise des réfugiés syriens : le silence des pays du Golfe fustigé par le frère Rachid. Publiée le 22 mai 2016 (6:58) vo.ar w. s-t.fr. ''Crise des réfugiés syriens : le silence des pays du Golfe fustigé par le frère Rachid.''
Crise des réfugiés syriens : le silence des pays du Golfe fustigé par le frère Rachid.
“Frère Rachid” est né au Maroc en 1971 et un ancien musulman converti au christianisme. Son père est un imam très respecté au Maroc.
Il est un des convertis qui parle le plus ouvertement.
Il a par exemple interpelé l’ancien président Obama en lui expliquant que les actions d’ISIS en Syrie et en Iran parlent bien au nom de l’islam, malgré les tentatives de dire le contraire, et maintient que le terrorisme commence dans les écoles et les mosquées, où la haine est enseignée aux enfants. AJOUT du 20 mars 2017 : Video taken in Libya in 2012. Publiée le 20 fév. 2017 (2:52) vo.ar ''Muslimsdestroy Jewish and Christian graves''
The Islamic State Plan to Conquer Rome : Defeat Christianity
Will Rome be conquered again ?
Is this part of an ISIS game plan to create Armageddon ?
Istanbul (Turkey) is already Muslim. Muslims have invaded Europe through uncontrolled immigration.
Publiée le 2 oct. 2015 (5:06) vo.en ''ISIS's first step: Conquer Rome, Defeat Christianity''
But, why Rome ?
Is Italy in any way an important country today ?
Perhaps, it is more symbolic than it is strategic.
But, if this is true, then mass be-headings in Europe may become a serious threat in the minds of masses of radical Islamic terrorists.
Publiée le 27 janv. 2016 (4:40) vo.en ''ISIS to take Rome by 2020''
Ça s'est passé en Janvier 2017 It's happened in January 2017...
At this point in our wild weather chronicles, we're starting to sound like a broken record. But it's not our fault ! The climate just keeps on swinging from extreme to extreme...
Snow fall in Japan Jan. 2017
Last month's highlights include :
Record wildfires in Chile and Argentina (where there was also record rainfall)
Record rainfall ending record drought in California
Record one-day and monthly snowfalls in Japan and the US West
Record tornado outbreaks in the US South
Record one-day rainfalls in the US South
Record-cold temperatures and snowfalls in eastern and southern Europe
Record snowfall in the Sahara
Record heat in Australia, and record cold in New Zealand
These were just some of the 'signs' of environmental upheaval around the world in January 2017...
Publiée le 27 fév. 2017 (21:45) vo.en '' SOTT Eath Change Summary - January 2017''
FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.
A small onyx stone, said to be a gift to a Knight Templar over 1000 years ago and handed down within a family, may actually be what the owner asserts : a gem originally worn by the High Priest in Jerusalem.
Publiée le 1er juin 2015*
[National News clip in South Africa from 1991]
The astounding report – corroborated by a number of independent experts – was contained in a story by Adam Berkowitz in Breaking Israel News.
According to the Talmud (Yoma 21b)1, the precious stones worn on the High Priest’s garments were lost when Jerusalem was sacked by the Babylonians.
Sardonyx stone whithin papyrus casket
There were 12 stones mounted on the breastplate of the High Priest and two sardonyx stones fixed in gold settings on the shoulders of the High Priest.
“And you shall put the two stones on the shoulder-pieces of the ephod, as stones of memorial for the sons of Israel ; and Aaron shall bear their names before the Lord on his two shoulders for a memorial.” [Exodus 28:12]
Experts believe this is one of the stones missing for centuries. If restored to the right hands, it could play a role in returning the priestly caste to serve in the Temple, according to Breaking Israel News.
Dr. James Strange
In 2000, Dr. James Strange, a professor in religious studies at the University of South Florida, traveled to South Africa to meet with the family in possession of the stone.
Dr. Strange earned his M.Div. from Yale Divinity School in 1964, and a PhD. in New Testament Studies from Drew University in 1970. He was a Montgomery Fellow at the W.F. Albright Institute for Archaeological Research in Jerusalem in 1970-71 and NEH fellow at the same Institute in 1980.
When Dr. Strange first met with the family he was not taking their claims about the stone seriously. But he was astonished by what they showed him. “I was indeed amazed at the gemstone,” Dr. Strange told Breaking Israel News. The stone itself was nothing special, a semi-precious sardonyx, with little intrinsic worth.
But the object he held in his hands confounded Dr. Strange. “I was unaware that anyone in the late Middle Ages had the technology to cut a hemisphere in such a medium, so I tried to exhaust all other explanations,” he said.
Even more amazing than the stone’s cut was the mysterious inscription buried within the stone, visible through the clear surface: two letters in ancient Hebrew.
Dr. Strange wrote in his appraisal of the gem, “There is no modern or ancient technology known to me by which an artisan could produce the inscription, as it is not cut into the surface of the stone.”
Dr. Strange asked for assistance from Ian Campbell, Director of the Independent Coloured Stones Laboratory in Johannesburg and a leading South African gemologist. Campbell was equally dumbfounded by the unusual features of the stone, according to Breaking Israel News.
Dr. Strange initially thought the owner’s story placing it on the High Priest’s garments was inconceivable. But the family had documentation that traced its descent from a Crusader-period male ancestor who was in the Holy Land in the Middle Ages and claimed the stone was a reward from the High Priest.
Owner of the stone
According to the Auret family tradition, the ancestor, named Croiz Arneet deTarn Auret, received the stone from “the High Priest” in gratitude for his part in freeing Jerusalem around 1189.
The stone was passed down within the Auret family through the male line until the nineteenth century. That tradition was broken when Abraham Auret died in 1889, leaving the stone to his daughter, Christina.
After her marriage to William Hurst, the stone left the Auret name, and was passed from mother to daughter. The family’s genealogical reports substantiate the story. Currently the stone is in possession of an elderly woman in South Africa, who wishes to remain anonymous, according to Breaking Israel News.
The stone was photographed with a microscope, confirming it had not been cut open to make the inscription.
Professor Moshe Sharon
The family’s oral tradition is that God’s hand inserted the mysterious inscription inside the stone.
Dr. Strange noted the stone had no external markings, so it wasn’t set in a ring or a necklace. He concluded it was probably part of a large plate or breastplate. He dated production of the stone to approximately the 5th century B.C.
Considering the stone’s unique historical significance, he appraised its value at us$175-$225 million, according to Breaking Christian News2.
Ian Campbell, the gemologist, photographed the stone with a microscope, confirming it had not been cut open to make the inscription.
The owner of the stone also consulted Professor Moshe Sharon from the University of Witwatersrand. Dr. Sharon was educated at the Hebrew University and the University of London, and has conducted research in Oxford, Paris and Dublin.
The professor, an expert in ancient Hebrew and Arabic epigraphy, was amazed to see clearly inside the stone itself, two letters in ancient Hebrew. The letters seemed to be engraved or burnt into the heart of the stone.
“Due to the clarity of the letters and their fine definition it would be incredible if they are a coincidental natural formation in the stone,” he stated in his notarized report. “The lack of any apparent sign of interference with the surface makes the existence of the letters inside the stone a real enigma.”
He noted the inscriptions in ancient Hebrew script of what he described as “the equivalent of our ‘B’ and ‘K’.” He identified the style of script, dating it to be from the year 1000 B.C., according to Breaking Israel News.
In 1994, Dr. Joan Westenholz, Chief Curator at the Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem, examined the stone. She concluded, “It is a unique object that has no similar or identical counterpart ; it is the only one of its kind in the world.”
Dr. Westenholz estimated the date of the stone’s production to be approximately the 7th century B.C. She noted the inscription “in the shape of a possible letter is a ninth century form of an archaic Hebrew letter bet.”
In her notarized report, she observed next to the letter bet “what can be perceived as the image of a wolf.” She noted that the wolf corresponded to the blessing Jacob gave Benjamin before Jacob’s death.
“Benjamin is a ravenous wolf; in the morning he devours the prey, and in the evening he divides the spoil.” ´[Genesis 49:27]
Dr. Westenholz and Ian Campbell have since passed away, but Breaking Israel News verified their statements and documentation as genuine.
Dr. Strange called for new examination of the gem. “I think this object needs a new appraisal and as many scientific tests as possible to determine whether it is genuine,” Dr. Strange told Breaking Israel News. par Mark Ellis Source
NOTES :
*. Video, vo.en (1:21) ''Sardonyx stone from the breastplate of High Priest Aaron in South-Africa''
LEARN MORE ABOUT :
Publiée le 13 mars 2016 (17:10) vo.fr ''Ex 28, 1-29 : Les habits du Grand-Prêtre (1)''
Publiée le 17 mars 2016 (15:48) vo.fr ''Ex 28, 29-43 : Les habits du Grand-Prêtre (2)''
Publiée le 24 fév. 2016 (2:05) vo.en ''The story of the Urim and Thummim''
Publiée le 22 juil. 2012 (6:00) vo.en '' What are Urim and the Thummim ?''
AJOUT du 20 mars 2017 : Exceptional discovery of a golden bell* of the dress of the High priest.
Publiée le 16 janv. 2012 (2:10) vo.mix w. s-t.en ''The Golden Bell - City of David''
We are excited to share
with you two truly incredible finds that were discovered in the City of David's
Herodian Road Aqueduct Excavation in recent days. The first is rare etching of
a menorah on stone, assumed to be the Temple Menorah.
According to the Israel Antiquities Authority, the fact that the stone object
was found at the closest proximity to the Temple Mount indicates that likely a
passerby who saw the menorah with his own eyes and was amazed by its beauty
incised his impressions on a stone and afterwards tossed his scrawling to the
side of the road. He could scarcely have imagined that his creation would be
found 2,000 years later on a slab of stone.
The second discovery is that of a Roman sword dated to the destruction of Jerusalem
in 70 CE, and found within the tunnel used by the last remaining Jews in
Jerusalem to hide from the Roman troops during the destruction of the Second
Temple.
This Roman sword very possibly belonged to one of the foot soldiers of the
Roman Legion in the last battle between the Romans and Jews over Jerusalem. The
sword, considered very rare because of its incredible preservation, was found
with its leather sheath partially intact.
Publiée le 9 oct. 2016 (4:42) vo.heb. w. s-t.en "מיוחד ליום כיפור: "כך
נשמעו צלילי פעמון הזהב של הכהן הגדול
Every one of these incredible facts confirm that the Bible is the
inspired Word of God. The Bible is truly a miraculous book which was written by
a number of inspired men of God and maintains perfect harmony. Moreover,
hundreds of prophecies have been dramatically fulfilled testifying that God
inspired it. In addition, the Bible has stood the test of time even though
people tried to destroy it.
Publiée le 10 août 2016 What happens when you die ?
Is there an afterlife ? Do people wander around as ghosts ? Does man have an
immortal soul ? Do people go straight to Heaven or Hell when they die ? The Bible has the answers !
Publiée le 21 oct. 2016 The Bible indicates that
the second coming of Jesus will come at a time when most do not expect. Most
will look up and say, "I knew He was coming. I just didn't know it would
be so soon !" The signs of the times are blaring at us like sirens and
flashing like neon lights in the night. The worst is yet to come, but so is the
best ! Get ready.
Publiée le 13 avr. 2015 As the son of a pastor, I
remember hearing about the second coming of Jesus Christ as preachers such as
Billy Graham preached about the return of Jesus to massive crowds. However,
after all these years, Jesus has not yet returned. Find out why by
watching this video !
Publiée le 14 mai 2016 Is Heaven a place where disembodied
spirits sit on puffy clouds playing harps ? Are we just going to float around for all eternity with nothing to do ?
What will Heaven look like ?
Trump can forge a US-Russia alliance on basis of Christian
conservative values
Donald Trump could easily turn the tables on his
anti-Russian opponents if he'd galvanize his Christian conservative base. It
may be his only chance for long-term political survival.
The war in Syria is often described as a holy war waged by
Salafist Jihadists who want to impose a dark and frankly blasphemous version of
Sunni Islam on the wider community of moderate Sunni’s, Shia Muslims, including
Alawites, Christians, and secularists. But in spite of the declared Islamism of
the opponents of President Assad’s secular, tolerant government, the war is all
about power, resources, and money.
It is why the tyrannical states of the Gulf such as Saudi
Arabia and Qatar are happy to fund the terrorist groups occupying parts of
Syria. It is colonialism justified by an un-Godly version of Islam. No one,
least of all true Muslims, should buy into the lie. The Islamic State is
frankly neither Islamic nor a state.
By contrast, in America, there is a holy war transpiring and
it is not a recent phenomenon, but under Donald Trump, it has taken on a new,
internationalized character.
Many people underestimate the importance of religion in the
political alignments of a vast number of Americans. This is especially true
among registered Republicans and independent conservatives who often consult
the Bible rather than a newspaper before going to the polls.
I can already hear the laughs of those in New York, San
Francisco and Los Angeles who feel their atheism, agnosticism or hedonism makes
them superior to the God fearing Christians of middle America. But this is no
laughing matter for those who take world affairs seriously and it shouldn’t be
a laughing matter for anyone who would rather see Trump in the White House than
a Hillary clone.
Religion, a theme which tends to disproportionally dominate
US elections vis-à-vis neighboring Canada and European states with similar
living standards, was surprisingly absent in the Presidential election of 2016.
This was largely due to the fact that Donald Trump, whilst a
Christian, grew up in the multi-religious melting pot of New York. However, he
promised that he would defend Christianity in America and his inaugural address
was the most religiously orientated speech of his political life. His support
among Christian voters surprised many skeptics.
How does this relate to Russia ?
The Democrats, neo-con Republicans (think McCain and
Graham), members of Trump’s team including Vice President Pence and elements of
the military industrial complex are gung-ho for conflict with Russia. The lies
told about Russia’s geopolitical actions are often totally ludicrous. The
extent to which these bodies will go to prevent a more sensible US policy
towards Russia from taking shape is wide reaching. Michael Flynn was the first
political casualty of the Russophobic deep state’s war against Trump.
However, at a more grassroots level, many on the American
liberal left are openly critical of Russia’s cultural conservatism and
Christianity is an essential part of Russian culture.
Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Saviour. The 'Vatican' of Russia ?
One needn’t be reminded of how many on the American left
rushed to the defense of the sick young women who called themselves ‘Pussy
Riot’ who conducted an insulting act of blasphemy inside Moscow’s Cathedral of
Christ the Saviour, one of the most important holy sites in Russia and indeed
in Orthodox Christianity.
If such an event took place in a church in America’s
so-called Bible belt, the conclusion of such an incident may have been far
different. It could have been much more violent.
Over the last hundred years, America’s Christians have
become far more ecumenical. Previous divides between Catholic and Protestant
and to some extent the Orthodox minority, have gradually transformed into a
politically and culturally united front against the forces of post-modern
ultra-liberalism who advocate the distribution of obscene materials, who try to
censor the public celebrations of Christian feasts and whom often treat
religious people with open disdain.
Many such American Christians know little of modern Russia
and care even less, but a growing number who are curious, have found that Russia
serves as an inspiration as Russia is a place where one can live as a
conservative Christian without rejecting the modern world and its positive
attributes and amenities.
Russia is an example of a successful, modern, wealthy,
powerful, conservative Christian country that many US Republicans and
independent conservatives would like America to be.
And this is where Trump could use a Trump card if only his
advisers developed an imagination and learned a thing or two about history and
geopolitics.
The same Democrats and leftist mainstream media who attack
Russia, also attack the US Bible Belt. What’s more is that their visceral
hatred of Russia is often derived directly from a hatred of conservatism and of
religion.
Those who also want the US to scale back from aggressive
posturing against Iran or China have not got this particular trump card as Iran
is an Islamic Republic and China is a communist/atheist country. But modern
Russia is neither. Russia is an increasingly Christian country and a moderately
but unmistakably conservative one.
Were Donald Trump to communicate to his supporters that the
anti-Russian brigades in Washington are the same people who deliver a
vociferously anti-Christian message towards ordinary Americans, he would go a
very long way in taking the wind out of the sails of the anti-Russian
hysterics.
If he does this, the burden of proof will be instantly
shifted from Trump to his opponents. Rather than having to either defend or
backtrack on his desire to foster better relations with Russia, the
ultra-liberals at CNN, New York Times and the Democratic Party would have to
demonstrate why provoking a Christian, conservative superpower is in the
interests of conservative Americans.
Such an argument would be virtually impossible to win unless
one lies as Russia has no desire to cause America an iota of harm. Russia
frankly threatens no one except the extremist terrorists that it is fighting
alongside the Syrian government, a government which incidentally is widely
supported by Syria’s besieged Christian minority.
The neo-cons would become irrelevant to some and suspicious
to others should Trump make this appeal.
One needn’t be religious to understand the importance of
this argument. It is an argument in the service of peace, more than anything
else and what’s more, unlike the fake news merchants, it relies on factual
realities rather than the alternative facts of those living in a parallel
universe.
This
is the key to Trump’s political survival and also the key to avoiding
confrontation between nuclear superpowers. par Adam Garrie, Source
Ça s'est passé en Décembre 2016... It's happened in December 2016...
As we enter a new and uncertain geopolitical climate with the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, so we also appear to be entering a new and uncertain natural climate.
The relentless global escalation of extreme weather, geological upheaval, and cosmic bombardment continued last month, ending a year the authorities claim was (again) "the warmest ever - and it's humans' fault." Still no explanation from them as to how 'man-made CO2' is responsible for - among other new or increased natural phenomena - all the sinkholes opening up and killing people ; the meteor fireballs raining out of the sky ; redirecting the course of high-altitude jet streams ; and increasing the frequency of earthquakes two or three-fold. But pay no attention to those details - they're probably just signs that we're heading into another ice age.
Snowfall in Qatar 2016
Highlights in this Earth Changes Summary video for December 2016 include :
Persistent, heavy fog across the world last month - northern Europe, India, China and the Persian Gulf
Return of the 'polar vortex' to both North America and Russia, bringing record-breaking snow and cold temperatures
Snow in the Sahara Desert, Arabian Desert, and Syria
Thundersnow, snow-nadoes, 'fog walls', 'fog domes', 'spinning ice disks', and other bizarre cold weather-related phenomena !
Severe flash-flooding (and a tornado) across southern 'sunny' Spain
Outbreak of forest fires in the Swiss Alps... in winter !?
At least a half dozen spectacular meteor fireball events in North and South America, Europe, and Central Asia
A string of powerful earthquakes and volcanic eruptions around the Pacific Ring of Fire
Widespread flooding in Southeast Asia during its 'dry season'
Record-breaking rainfall in Australia's desert regions.
Publiée le 20 janv. 2017 (24:28) vo-eng ''SOTT Earth Change Summary - December 2016''
EN FRANÇAIS Alors
que nous entrons dans un climat géopolitique nouveau et incertain avec
l'investiture du président étasunien Donald Trump, nous semblons également
entrer dans un climat naturel nouveau et incertain.
L'incessante augmentation mondiale des conditions météorologiques extrêmes, des
bouleversements géologiques et des bombardements cosmiques s'est poursuivie le
mois dernier, clôturant une année que les autorités ont déclarées être (à
nouveau) « la plus chaude jamais enregistrée - et c'est la faute des humains ».
Pourtant, toujours aucune explication de leur part quant à la façon dont le «
CO2 créé par l'homme » est responsable, entre autres de phénomènes naturels
nouveaux ou accrus, de toutes les dolines qui s'ouvrent et tuent des personnes
; des boules de feu météoriques qui jaillissent dans nos cieux ; du changement
d'orientation des courants-jest à haute altitude ; et de l'augmentation de la
fréquence des séismes multiplié par deux, voire trois.
Mais ne vous préoccupez pas de ces détails - ce sont probablement juste des
signes indiquant que nous nous dirigeons vers une autre époque glaciaire.
Les points forts de notre vidéo mensuelle de décembre 2016 comprennent :
Un persistant et lourd brouillard à travers le monde le mois dernier - Europe
du Nord, Inde, Chine et golfe Persique.
Le retour du « vortex polaire » à la fois en Amérique du Nord et en Russie,
avec des records de neige et de froid.
De la neige dans le désert du Sahara, le désert d'Arabie et la Syrie.
Des tempêtes de neige, tornades de neige, des « murs de brouillard », des «
dômes de brouillard », des « disques de glace en rotation », et d'autres
phénomènes météorologiques bizarres liés au froid !
Une forte inondation (et une tornade) à travers le sud de l'« ensoleillée »
Espagne.
Éclosion de feux de forêt dans les Alpes suisses... en hiver !?
Au moins une demi-douzaine d'événements météorologiques spectaculaires en
Amérique du Nord et du Sud, en Europe et en Asie centrale.
Une succession de puissants tremblements de terre et des éruptions volcaniques
autour de l'anneau de feu du Pacifique.
Des inondations répandues en Asie du Sud-Est pendant la « saison sèche ».
Des précipitations record dans les régions désertiques de l'Australie.
Publiée le 2 fév.2017 (24:30) vo.st-fr ''Résumé SOTT Changements terrestres - Décembre 2016)
FAIR
USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up
video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video
and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and
106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in
copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are
HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their
copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill
of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct
violation of Fair Use Law.
In 2018, in the Europa, a proposal for an EU initiative on restrictions on payments in cash
Commission initiative in 2018.
WE CAN NO LONGER BUY OR SELL.
This is a .pdf document*. Here is the following ORDER...
INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE ::Proposal for an EU initiative on restrictions on payments in cash
LEAD DG – RESPONSIBLE UNIT – AP NUMBER ::ECFIN.DDG1.C.5
DATE OF ROADMAP ::23/01/2017
LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE ::Legislative initiative
INDICATIVE PLANNING ::Commission initiative in 2018
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ::(None)
This Inception Impact Assessment aims to inform stakeholders about the Commission's work in order to allow them to provide feedback on the intended initiative and to participate effectively in future consultation activities. Stakeholders are in particular invited to provide views on the Commission's understanding of the problem and possible solutions and to make available any relevant information that they may have, including on possible impacts of the different options. The Inception Impact Assessment is provided for information purposes only and its content may change. This Inception Impact Assessment does not prejudge the final decision of the Commission on whether this initiative will be pursued or on its final content.
A- Context, Problem definition and Subsidiarity Check
Context
The Commission published on 2 February 2016 a Communication to the Council and the Parliament on an Action Plan to further step up the fight against the financing of terrorism (COM (2016) 50). The Action Plan builds on existing EU rules to adapt to new threats and aims at updating EU policies in line with international standards. In the context of the Commission's action to extent the scope of the Regulation on the controls of cash entering or leaving the Community1, reference is made to the appropriateness to explore the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments. The Action Plan states that "Payments in cash are widely used in the financing of terrorist activities… In this context, the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments could also be explored. Several Member States have in place prohibitions for cash payments above a specific threshold." While a number of Member States already have (or have had) in place restrictions to cash payments as a measure to combat crime, this has not been addressed at Union level. In its Conclusions on the fight against terrorism, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 12 February 2016 called on the Commission to explore the need for appropriate restrictions on cash payments exceeding certain thresholds. Direct linkages exist with other initiatives stemming from the Action Plan to strengthen the fight against terrorism financing, in particular the Proposal for an amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive2 (COM (2016) 450), which introduced stricter transparency rules and other measures targeted specifically at terrorism financing. Furthermore, the initiative should be seen in conjunction with the ECB's decision of 4 May 20163 to discontinue the production of the EUR 500 banknote and stop the issuance of this denomination by around 2018 to address concerns that these notes could be used in financing illicit activities. This initiative is complementary to the amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering Directive and shares the Action Plan's objective of bearing effect in a short and medium term future. Therefore, any measure restricting cash payments would be complementary to the specific actions addressed by the review of the AML Directive targeting risks posed, inter alia, by virtual currencies and prepaid instruments when they are used anonymously. Existing rules that apply in the Union in closely connected fields include the following instruments.
- Third Anti-Money Laundering Directive covering dealers in high-value goods, such as works of art, precious stones or auctioneers, which requires that they apply customer due diligence measures, identification of customers and keeping records of transactions when receiving cash payments of €15,000 or more.
- The Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, adopted in May 2015 and which is due to be transposed by June 2017, confirms the vulnerability of large cash payments to money laundering and terrorist financing and with this in mind, has extended the scope of application of customer due diligence measures to cash payments of €10,000 or more. The initiative has also direct linkages with the Proposal for an amendment of the Regulation on the controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (COM (2016) 825) and both frameworks should be coherent. In general, it is important to remember that cash is also the most accessible means of payment, and remains widely used. An important part of the public regards payment by cash as a personal freedom. Any change of policy would therefore be quite sensitive, and should start from the assumption that many could oppose restrictions on the use of cash and that such opposition could be built on sensible arguments.
Problem the initiative aims to tackle
Cash has the important feature of offering anonymity to transactions. Such anonymity may be desired for legitimate reason (e.g. protection of privacy). But, such anonymity can also be misused for money laundering and terrorist financing purposes. The possibility to conduct large cash payments facilitates money laundering and terrorist financing activities because of the difficulty to control cash payment transactions. In that context, there remains the lack of readily available and solid evidence on legitimate vs illegitimate cash transactions. It is difficult to quantify the legitimate or illegitimate use of cash. Information stemming from Law Enforcement investigations indicates that cash, both for criminal payments and money laundering purposes, remains the instrument of choice. There are also several studies and academic journals4 that indicate the strong linkages of criminal activities by organised criminal groups to money laundering and large scale payments in cash. On the international level, in its October 2015 report Money Laundering Through the Physical Transportation of Cash5, the Financial Action Task Force estimated the amount of money involved as hundreds of billions of dollars globally. It described cash as ‘the raw material of most criminal activity’ and warned that as anti-money laundering measures around the world become even more stringent, money laundering through physically moving cash would become increasingly attractive to criminals. Potential restrictions to cash payments would be a mean to fight criminal activities entailing large payment transactions in cash by organised criminal networks. Restricting large payments in cash, in addition to cash declarations and other AML obligations, would hamper the operation of terrorist networks, and other criminal activities, i.e. have a preventive effect. It would also facilitate further investigations to track financial transactions in the course of terrorist activities. Effective investigations are hindered as cash payments transactions are anonymous. Thus restrictions on cash payments would facilitate investigations. However, as cash transactions are moved to the financial system, it is essential that financial institutions have adequate controls and procedures in place that enable them to know the person with whom they are dealing. Adequate due diligence on new and existing customers is a key part of these controls in, line with the AMLD. Terrorists use cash to sustain their illegal activities, not only for illegal transactions (e.g. the acquisition of explosives) but also for payments which are in appearance legal (e.g. transactions for accommodation or transport). While a restriction on payments in cash would certainly be ignored for transactions that are in any case already illegal, the restriction could create a significant hindrance to the conduct of transactions that are ancillary to terrorist activities, but which are in appearance legal and conducted with non-criminal counterparts that are eager to respect the law. The existence of cash payments limitations in some Member States, and their absence in other Member States, creates the possibility for criminals and terrorists to bypass the restrictions by moving to the Member States, which have not introduced any restrictions, while still conducting their illegal activities in the 'stricter' Member State. Furthermore, such diverging practices among Member States regarding restrictions on cash payments create an uneven playing field and these differing restrictions create distortions of competition in the internal market, with some activities moving across border to elude the cash restriction. The lack of approximated measures at EU level makes the (reinforced) controls by the Member States ineffective.
Subsidiarity check (and legal basis)
Currently, restrictions on cash payments have been implemented independently at national level and such restrictions are generally considered compatible with Union law. For the euro area, Recital 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 states that ‘limitations on payments in notes and coins, established by Member States for public reasons, are not incompatible with the status of legal tender of euro banknotes and coins, provided that other lawful means for the settlement of monetary debts are available'. While it could be indicative that Member States having introduced restrictions on cash payments have not raised any objection against the Member States which have not taken such measures or vice versa, it must be observed that the restriction of high value cash payments in some Member States has mainly been imposed so far to avoid tax evasion.
However, there is a case for action at EU level, as the existence of cash payment limitations in some Member States, and their absence in other Member States, allows activities to be moved across border to elude the cash restrictions. Also, the lack of uniform-approximated measures at EU level makes the (reinforced) controls by the Member States ineffective. Action at EU level is warranted because national initiatives without coordination would impair effectiveness. Moreover, citizens and businesses have different options of payments such as electronic means of payments (e.g. credit and debit cards). Anyhow a measure restricting cash payments would only target higher amounts of payments. Therefore, such a measure would limit the options for terrorist networks to finance their terrorist activities. Against this background, (legislative) action at the EU level meets the requirements of proportionality and subsidiarity as enshrined in Article 5 (4) of the EU Treaty. The exact legal base will depend on the nature of the action proposed. In case a legislative proposal is put forward, Article 114 TFEU could potentially be considered as an appropriate legal basis for being the legal base of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive, which pursues similar objectives.
B- Objectives and Policy options
In line with the Commission's above-mentioned Action Plan, the objective of the initiative is to swiftly reinforce the EU framework on the prevention of terrorism financing by enhancing transparency of cash payments through an introduction of a restriction of cash payments or by any other appropriate means. Organised crime and terrorism financing rely on cash for payments for carrying out their illegal activities and benefitting from them. By restricting the possibilities to use cash, the proposal would contribute to disrupt the financing of terrorism, as the need to use non anonymous means of payment would either deter the activity or contribute to its easier detection and investigation. Any such proposal would also aim at harmonising restrictions across the Union, thus creating a level playing field for businesses and removing distortions of competition in the internal market. It would additionally foster the fight against money laundering, tax fraud and organised crime.
Baseline scenario – no EU policy change
In the baseline scenario, the absence of Europe wide restrictions to and controls of cash payments will continue to facilitate the financing of terrorism and other criminal activities by ensuring the anonymity of these payments in many Member States, which hinders prevention, investigation and prosecution. Inconsistent national practices will continue allowing bypassing existing national restrictions, as terrorists or other criminals have the opportunity to organise their financial transactions in a way that takes advantage of non-existent or lower restrictions in some Member States. Furthermore, the existence of diverging national legislation complicates compliance by EU citizens, who need to be aware of the national legislation applicable. Finally, the existence of divergent practices is detrimental to an even playing field in the Internal Market. However, it should also be pointed out that the access to unrestricted cash payments also facilitates payments by EU citizens, who may not always have access to similarly cheap and simple alternatives, implying reliance on costlier alternatives.
Options of improving implementation and enforcement of existing legislation or doing less/simplifying existing legislation
At EU level no legislation exists which can be simplified or improved. Some Member States have legislation on cash payment limits at national level which however differ substantially from one another. Harmonising such legislation through EU action would certainly constitute a simplification of existing legislation and facilitate compliance and enforcement at EU level.
Options of a legislative initiative
Restriction versus declaration. As preventing the anonymity linked to cash payments is the main driver, the objective can be attained by restricting cash payments through an EU legislative instrument, and thereby forcing payments through means that are not anonymous (bank transfers, checks, etc.). But the same objective could also be attained by, while still allowing unrestricted cash payments, imposing a declaration to a competent authority. This would allow the continuous reliance on cash payments, with its benefits in terms of simplicity and cost. It could also constitute a more effective measure compared to a pure restriction, by inducing declaration by honest parties to any transaction, if the declaration had to be made independently by all parties to the payments (any party to a transaction could be enticed to still accept cash under the pressure of the other party, while such other party would have less control on whether the first party effectively filed a declaration). However, the obligation of declaration would also have drawbacks. First, it would impose an administrative burden on businesses and citizens and require organising the treatment of the numerous declarations (monitoring, investigation, etc.). Second, it would raise the question of the consistency and redundancy with existing national restrictions on cash payments, which ideally should be then abolished to still pursue an internal market objective, or with the obligation to declare cash when crossing borders. Finally, the obligation to declare payments in cash rather than restricting them has not been implemented by any MS, nor promoted by the law enforcement community, which could indicate that they consider such measure as less efficient than a simple restriction. When considering a restriction or a declaration obligation, the following options are also faced.
Level of the threshold. Existing national restrictions on cash payments vary widely. The higher the threshold, the more the convenience of cash transaction is preserved, but the higher the risk that criminal cash transactions fall through the net. The level of the threshold would also depend on whether it relates to a full restriction or only to a declaration obligation, in which case it could be assumed to be lower.
Single threshold or variable threshold per country within some bandwidth. A single threshold is necessary to simplify existing practices, avoid distortions in the Internal Market and facilitate compliance by citizens. However, it must be observed that a single threshold may not take into account the diverging purchasing powers, payments practices and availability of alternative payment means in the EU. Variable thresholds could be contemplated either directly through the EU initiative, or by setting a highest limit and allowing Member States to establish lower ones.
Application to all transactions or only to transactions including a business party or specific businesses. While applying restrictions to all transactions would constitute a significant simplification, current national practices often differentiate transactions between purely private persons, which are sometimes exempted of any restriction, and transactions that include one or more business parties, or specific business sectors.
Exemption of non-residents. Because a restriction on cash transaction supposes the availability of alternatives means of payments, nonresidents are sometimes excluded from the restriction because they are deemed not to have easy access to the domestic banking system.
Alternative policy instrument
Restrictions on conducting large payments in cash could be advocated at EU level through a Commission recommendation. However, considering the existing divergences, it is doubtful that such recommendation would lead to an adoption of harmonised restrictions in all EU Member States. Self-regulation does not appear to be a viable option considering the objectives pursued (fight against criminality and terrorism). None of the participants to high value cash transactions would have any incentive to adopt such behaviour.
Alternative policy approach
Abolishing altogether the use of cash would reach the objective pursued, but would lack any proportionality since cash payments still constitute a major mean of payments firmly grounded in every day's life, for which alternatives have all some drawback, in particular for smaller payments. Compatibility of such abolition with current Treaties could also be challenged. Restrictions on large payments in cash could also be pursued by withdrawing the availability of high denomination banknotes, which facilitate the conduct of large cash payments. The ECB has already decided to progressively phase out the €500 banknote. But as long as cash exists, large payments will remain possible even with lower denomination banknotes, which only render the transaction more cumbersome, but not impossible.
Options that take account of new technological developments
In view of the development of cryptocurrencies and the existence of other means of payments ensuring anonymity, an option could be to extend the restrictions to cash payments to all payments ensuring anonymity (cryptocurrencies, payment in kinds, etc.). On the other hand, restrictions on cash payments could promote the development of alternative payments technologies compatible with the non-anonymity objective pursued.
Preliminary proportionality check
No preliminary check has been done as there isn’t a previous legislative measure on this issue.
C- Preliminary Assessment of Expected Impacts
Likely economic impacts
The proposal should not produce any visible global macroeconomic impact. Some specific sectors, relying significantly on cash payments, could be more impacted, although it is difficult to assess whether the impact will be permanent or whether the introduction of restriction will just lead to adapting practices. It has to be noted that the restriction would not apply below the threshold and would thus not affect small traders. The introduction of harmonised EU wide restrictions should prevent the distortions of competition (uneven playing field) occurring when restrictions exist only in some Member States and affect businesses unevenly within the internal market. Regarding the fiscal policy, the likely positive impact on money laundering and tax fraud is expected to be positive by increasing fiscal revenues.
Likely social impacts
Receipts of payments in cash constitute a cost-free and credit-risk store of value facilitating people to buy goods of high value such as cars. Similarly, relying on cash has been shown to limit the risk of excessive spending and indebtedness. A proposal in this area would also contribute, together with other policies against organised crime, terrorism and terrorism financing, to the security of European citizens and the European society as a whole.
Likely environmental impacts
None
Likely impacts on fundamental rights
While being allowed to pay in cash does not constitute a fundamental right, the objective of the initiative, which is to prevent the anonymity that cash payments allow, might be viewed as an infringement of the right to privacy enshrined in Article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. However, as complemented by Article 52 of the Charter, limitations may be made subject to the principle of proportionality if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. The objectives of potential restrictions to cash payments could fit such description. It should also be observed that national restrictions to cash payments were never successfully challenged based on an infringement to fundamental rights.
Likely impacts on simplification and/or administrative burden
Approximating restrictions at EU level will remove the burden of having to comply with diverging national legislations.
D- Data Collection and Better Regulation Instruments
Impact assessment
An impact assessment is being prepared to support the preparation of this initiative and to inform the Commission's decision. The following DGs will be invited :
o DG ECFIN
o DG HOME
o DG JUST
o DG FISMA
o DG TAXUD
o SJ
o SG
o DG CNECT
o DG GROW
Data collection
Data on legitimate and illegitimate use of cash should ideally be collected to substantiate the need of the initiative. Such information will most certainly come from law enforcement authorities and Europol. However, it should be understood that, like for all underground and criminal activities, information will not be easily available, and rough estimates might have to be used. The initiative will also build on existing evaluations, in particular from a law enforcement perspective. The most relevant evidence is contained in the Europol report "Why is cash still king?"6 . Other sources include the various studies, reports and documents conducted and published by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the regional body, Moneyval7.
Consultation strategy
The affected stakeholders are :
· law enforcement, custom and tax authorities, whose action is affected by the use of cash, which allows the hiding of financial transactions,
· central banks, as the issuers of cash and beneficiaries of seigniorage income,
· businesses and citizens would be impacted by a restriction on cash payments because cash remains a significant mean of payments for both citizens and businesses.
In order to explore the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments, the Commission carried out three informal surveys: one addressed to national authorities taking stock in some detail on the existing restrictions to cash payments at national level and why these were introduced, one addressed to law enforcement authorities on the issue of crime prevention and enforceability, and a third one on the views of the private sector and businesses. The latter one was not exhaustive, as only a selected number of stakeholders deemed potentially most affected were targeted. A wide-ranging open online public consultation should also be carried out to give all stakeholders the opportunities to express their view. The launch of this consultation will be announced on the 'Your Voice in Europe website' (http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/consultations/index_en.htm).
Will an Implementation plan be established ?
Depending on the complexity of the final proposal and the legal instrument used, an implementation plan might be established.
1. Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community, OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 9.
2. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC, OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p.73.
7. The Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism – (Moneyval) is a permanent monitoring body of the Council of Europe.
Re-AJOUT au 07 août 2017
Publiée le 04 mars 2017 (10:38) vo.de w. trad-fr ''Ce qui se cache derrière l'abolition de l'argent liquide''
