Nature, When the weather becomes mad, Déc. 2016

Ça s'est passé en Décembre 2016...
It's happened in December 2016...

As we enter a new and uncertain geopolitical climate with the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, so we also appear to be entering a new and uncertain natural climate. 

The relentless global escalation of extreme weather, geological upheaval, and cosmic bombardment continued last month, ending a year the authorities claim was (again) "the warmest ever - and it's humans' fault." 
Still no explanation from them as to how 'man-made CO2' is responsible for - among other new or increased natural phenomena - all the sinkholes opening up and killing people ; the meteor fireballs raining out of the sky ; redirecting the course of high-altitude jet streams ; and increasing the frequency of earthquakes two or three-fold. 
But pay no attention to those details - they're probably just signs that we're heading into another ice age. 

Snowfall in Qatar 2016

Highlights in this Earth Changes Summary video for December 2016 include : 

• Persistent, heavy fog across the world last month - northern Europe, India, China and the Persian Gulf 
• Return of the 'polar vortex' to both North America and Russia, bringing record-breaking snow and cold temperatures 
• Snow in the Sahara Desert, Arabian Desert, and Syria 
• Thundersnow, snow-nadoes, 'fog walls', 'fog domes', 'spinning ice disks', and other bizarre cold weather-related phenomena ! 
• Severe flash-flooding (and a tornado) across southern 'sunny' Spain 
• Outbreak of forest fires in the Swiss Alps... in winter !? 
• At least a half dozen spectacular meteor fireball events in North and South America, Europe, and Central Asia 
• A string of powerful earthquakes and volcanic eruptions around the Pacific Ring of Fire 
• Widespread flooding in Southeast Asia during its 'dry season' 
• Record-breaking rainfall in Australia's desert regions.

Publiée le 20 janv. 2017 (24:28) vo-eng ''SOTT Earth Change Summary - December 2016'' 

EN FRANÇAIS  
Alors que nous entrons dans un climat géopolitique nouveau et incertain avec l'investiture du président étasunien Donald Trump, nous semblons également entrer dans un climat naturel nouveau et incertain. 

L'incessante augmentation mondiale des conditions météorologiques extrêmes, des bouleversements géologiques et des bombardements cosmiques s'est poursuivie le mois dernier, clôturant une année que les autorités ont déclarées être (à nouveau) « la plus chaude jamais enregistrée - et c'est la faute des humains ». 

Pourtant, toujours aucune explication de leur part quant à la façon dont le « CO2 créé par l'homme » est responsable, entre autres de phénomènes naturels nouveaux ou accrus, de toutes les dolines qui s'ouvrent et tuent des personnes ; des boules de feu météoriques qui jaillissent dans nos cieux ; du changement d'orientation des courants-jest à haute altitude ; et de l'augmentation de la fréquence des séismes multiplié par deux, voire trois. 

Mais ne vous préoccupez pas de ces détails - ce sont probablement juste des signes indiquant que nous nous dirigeons vers une autre époque glaciaire. 

Les points forts de notre vidéo mensuelle de décembre 2016 comprennent : 

• Un persistant et lourd brouillard à travers le monde le mois dernier - Europe du Nord, Inde, Chine et golfe Persique. 
• Le retour du « vortex polaire » à la fois en Amérique du Nord et en Russie, avec des records de neige et de froid. 
• De la neige dans le désert du Sahara, le désert d'Arabie et la Syrie. 
• Des tempêtes de neige, tornades de neige, des « murs de brouillard », des « dômes de brouillard », des « disques de glace en rotation », et d'autres phénomènes météorologiques bizarres liés au froid ! 
• Une forte inondation (et une tornade) à travers le sud de l'« ensoleillée » Espagne. 
• Éclosion de feux de forêt dans les Alpes suisses... en hiver !? 
• Au moins une demi-douzaine d'événements météorologiques spectaculaires en Amérique du Nord et du Sud, en Europe et en Asie centrale. 
• Une succession de puissants tremblements de terre et des éruptions volcaniques autour de l'anneau de feu du Pacifique. 
• Des inondations répandues en Asie du Sud-Est pendant la « saison sèche ». 
• Des précipitations record dans les régions désertiques de l'Australie.

Publiée le 2 fév.2017 (24:30) vo.st-fr ''Résumé SOTT Changements terrestres - Décembre 2016) 

FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.

NWO, 2018, No more money in your wallet

In 2018, in the Europa, a proposal for an EU initiative on restrictions on payments in cash

Commission initiative in 2018.

WE  CAN  NO  LONGER  BUY  OR  SELL. 

This is a .pdf document*. Here is the following ORDER...

INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT

TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE :: Proposal for an EU initiative on restrictions on payments in cash

LEAD DG – RESPONSIBLE UNIT – AP NUMBER :: ECFIN.DDG1.C.5

DATE OF ROADMAP :: 23/01/2017

LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE :: Legislative initiative

INDICATIVE PLANNING :: Commission initiative in 2018

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :: (None)

This Inception Impact Assessment aims to inform stakeholders about the Commission's work in order to allow them to provide feedback on the intended initiative and to participate effectively in future consultation activities. Stakeholders are in particular invited to provide views on the Commission's understanding of the problem and possible solutions and to make available any relevant information that they may have, including on possible impacts of the different options. The Inception Impact Assessment is provided for information purposes only and its content may change. This Inception Impact Assessment does not prejudge the final decision of the Commission on whether this initiative will be pursued or on its final content.

A-   Context, Problem definition and Subsidiarity Check

Context

The Commission published on 2 February 2016 a Communication to the Council and the Parliament on an Action Plan to further step up the fight against the financing of terrorism (COM (2016) 50). The Action Plan builds on existing EU rules to adapt to new threats and aims at updating EU policies in line with international standards. In the context of the Commission's action to extent the scope of the Regulation on the controls of cash entering or leaving the Community1 , reference is made to the appropriateness to explore the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments. The Action Plan states that "Payments in cash are widely used in the financing of terrorist activities… In this context, the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments could also be explored. Several Member States have in place prohibitions for cash payments above a specific threshold." While a number of Member States already have (or have had) in place restrictions to cash payments as a measure to combat crime, this has not been addressed at Union level. In its Conclusions on the fight against terrorism, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 12 February 2016 called on the Commission to explore the need for appropriate restrictions on cash payments exceeding certain thresholds. Direct linkages exist with other initiatives stemming from the Action Plan to strengthen the fight against terrorism financing, in particular the Proposal for an amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive2 (COM (2016) 450), which introduced stricter transparency rules and other measures targeted specifically at terrorism financing. Furthermore, the initiative should be seen in conjunction with the ECB's decision of 4 May 20163 to discontinue the production of the EUR 500 banknote and stop the issuance of this denomination by around 2018 to address concerns that these notes could be used in financing illicit activities. This initiative is complementary to the amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering Directive and shares the Action Plan's objective of bearing effect in a short and medium term future. Therefore, any measure restricting cash payments would be complementary to the specific actions addressed by the review of the AML Directive targeting risks posed, inter alia, by virtual currencies and prepaid instruments when they are used anonymously. Existing rules that apply in the Union in closely connected fields include the following instruments. 

- Third Anti-Money Laundering Directive covering dealers in high-value goods, such as works of art, precious stones or auctioneers, which requires that they apply customer due diligence measures, identification of customers and keeping records of transactions when receiving cash payments of €15,000 or more. 

- The Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, adopted in May 2015 and which is due to be transposed by June 2017, confirms the vulnerability of large cash payments to money laundering and terrorist financing and with this in mind, has extended the scope of application of customer due diligence measures to cash payments of €10,000 or more. The initiative has also direct linkages with the Proposal for an amendment of the Regulation on the controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (COM (2016) 825) and both frameworks should be coherent. In general, it is important to remember that cash is also the most accessible means of payment, and remains widely used. An important part of the public regards payment by cash as a personal freedom. Any change of policy would therefore be quite sensitive, and should start from the assumption that many could oppose restrictions on the use of cash and that such opposition could be built on sensible arguments.

Problem the initiative aims to tackle

Cash has the important feature of offering anonymity to transactions. Such anonymity may be desired for legitimate reason (e.g. protection of privacy). But, such anonymity can also be misused for money laundering and terrorist financing purposes. The possibility to conduct large cash payments facilitates money laundering and terrorist financing activities because of the difficulty to control cash payment transactions. In that context, there remains the lack of readily available and solid evidence on legitimate vs illegitimate cash transactions. It is difficult to quantify the legitimate or illegitimate use of cash. Information stemming from Law Enforcement investigations indicates that cash, both for criminal payments and money laundering purposes, remains the instrument of choice. There are also several studies and academic journals4 that indicate the strong linkages of criminal activities by organised criminal groups to money laundering and large scale payments in cash. On the international level, in its October 2015 report Money Laundering Through the Physical Transportation of Cash5 , the Financial Action Task Force estimated the amount of money involved as hundreds of billions of dollars globally. It described cash as ‘the raw material of most criminal activity’ and warned that as anti-money laundering measures around the world become even more stringent, money laundering through physically moving cash would become increasingly attractive to criminals. Potential restrictions to cash payments would be a mean to fight criminal activities entailing large payment transactions in cash by organised criminal networks. Restricting large payments in cash, in addition to cash declarations and other AML obligations, would hamper the operation of terrorist networks, and other criminal activities, i.e. have a preventive effect. It would also facilitate further investigations to track financial transactions in the course of terrorist activities. Effective investigations are hindered as cash payments transactions are anonymous. Thus restrictions on cash payments would facilitate investigations. However, as cash transactions are moved to the financial system, it is essential that financial institutions have adequate controls and procedures in place that enable them to know the person with whom they are dealing. Adequate due diligence on new and existing customers is a key part of these controls in, line with the AMLD. Terrorists use cash to sustain their illegal activities, not only for illegal transactions (e.g. the acquisition of explosives) but also for payments which are in appearance legal (e.g. transactions for accommodation or transport). While a restriction on payments in cash would certainly be ignored for transactions that are in any case already illegal, the restriction could create a significant hindrance to the conduct of transactions that are ancillary to terrorist activities, but which are in appearance legal and conducted with non-criminal counterparts that are eager to respect the law. The existence of cash payments limitations in some Member States, and their absence in other Member States, creates the possibility for criminals and terrorists to bypass the restrictions by moving to the Member States, which have not introduced any restrictions, while still conducting their illegal activities in the 'stricter' Member State. Furthermore, such diverging practices among Member States regarding restrictions on cash payments create an uneven playing field and these differing restrictions create distortions of competition in the internal market, with some activities moving across border to elude the cash restriction. The lack of approximated measures at EU level makes the (reinforced) controls by the Member States ineffective.

Subsidiarity check (and legal basis)

Currently, restrictions on cash payments have been implemented independently at national level and such restrictions are generally considered compatible with Union law. For the euro area, Recital 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 states that ‘limitations on payments in notes and coins, established by Member States for public reasons, are not incompatible with the status of legal tender of euro banknotes and coins, provided that other lawful means for the settlement of monetary debts are available'. While it could be indicative that Member States having introduced restrictions on cash payments have not raised any objection against the Member States which have not taken such measures or vice versa, it must be observed that the restriction of high value cash payments in some Member States has mainly been imposed so far to avoid tax evasion. 

However, there is a case for action at EU level, as the existence of cash payment limitations in some Member States, and their absence in other Member States, allows activities to be moved across border to elude the cash restrictions. Also, the lack of uniform-approximated measures at EU level makes the (reinforced) controls by the Member States ineffective. Action at EU level is warranted because national initiatives without coordination would impair effectiveness. Moreover, citizens and businesses have different options of payments such as electronic means of payments (e.g. credit and debit cards). Anyhow a measure restricting cash payments would only target higher amounts of payments. Therefore, such a measure would limit the options for terrorist networks to finance their terrorist activities. Against this background, (legislative) action at the EU level meets the requirements of proportionality and subsidiarity as enshrined in Article 5 (4) of the EU Treaty. The exact legal base will depend on the nature of the action proposed. In case a legislative proposal is put forward, Article 114 TFEU could potentially be considered as an appropriate legal basis for being the legal base of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive, which pursues similar objectives.

B-  Objectives and Policy options

In line with the Commission's above-mentioned Action Plan, the objective of the initiative is to swiftly reinforce the EU framework on the prevention of terrorism financing by enhancing transparency of cash payments through an introduction of a restriction of cash payments or by any other appropriate means. Organised crime and terrorism financing rely on cash for payments for carrying out their illegal activities and benefitting from them. By restricting the possibilities to use cash, the proposal would contribute to disrupt the financing of terrorism, as the need to use non anonymous means of payment would either deter the activity or contribute to its easier detection and investigation. Any such proposal would also aim at harmonising restrictions across the Union, thus creating a level playing field for businesses and removing distortions of competition in the internal market. It would additionally foster the fight against money laundering, tax fraud and organised crime.

Baseline scenario – no EU policy change

In the baseline scenario, the absence of Europe wide restrictions to and controls of cash payments will continue to facilitate the financing of terrorism and other criminal activities by ensuring the anonymity of these payments in many Member States, which hinders prevention, investigation and prosecution. Inconsistent national practices will continue allowing bypassing existing national restrictions, as terrorists or other criminals have the opportunity to organise their financial transactions in a way that takes advantage of non-existent or lower restrictions in some Member States. Furthermore, the existence of diverging national legislation complicates compliance by EU citizens, who need to be aware of the national legislation applicable. Finally, the existence of divergent practices is detrimental to an even playing field in the Internal Market. However, it should also be pointed out that the access to unrestricted cash payments also facilitates payments by EU citizens, who may not always have access to similarly cheap and simple alternatives, implying reliance on costlier alternatives.

Options of improving implementation and enforcement of existing legislation or doing less/simplifying existing legislation

At EU level no legislation exists which can be simplified or improved. Some Member States have legislation on cash payment limits at national level which however differ substantially from one another. Harmonising such legislation through EU action would certainly constitute a simplification of existing legislation and facilitate compliance and enforcement at EU level.

Options of a legislative initiative

Restriction versus declaration. As preventing the anonymity linked to cash payments is the main driver, the objective can be attained by restricting cash payments through an EU legislative instrument, and thereby forcing payments through means that are not anonymous (bank transfers, checks, etc.). But the same objective could also be attained by, while still allowing unrestricted cash payments, imposing a declaration to a competent authority. This would allow the continuous reliance on cash payments, with its benefits in terms of simplicity and cost. It could also constitute a more effective measure compared to a pure restriction, by inducing declaration by honest parties to any transaction, if the declaration had to be made independently by all parties to the payments (any party to a transaction could be enticed to still accept cash under the pressure of the other party, while such other party would have less control on whether the first party effectively filed a declaration). However, the obligation of declaration would also have drawbacks. First, it would impose an administrative burden on businesses and citizens and require organising the treatment of the numerous declarations (monitoring, investigation, etc.). Second, it would raise the question of the consistency and redundancy with existing national restrictions on cash payments, which ideally should be then abolished to still pursue an internal market objective, or with the obligation to declare cash when crossing borders. Finally, the obligation to declare payments in cash rather than restricting them has not been implemented by any MS, nor promoted by the law enforcement community, which could indicate that they consider such measure as less efficient than a simple restriction. When considering a restriction or a declaration obligation, the following options are also faced.

Level of the threshold. Existing national restrictions on cash payments vary widely. The higher the threshold, the more the convenience of cash transaction is preserved, but the higher the risk that criminal cash transactions fall through the net. The level of the threshold would also depend on whether it relates to a full restriction or only to a declaration obligation, in which case it could be assumed to be lower.

Single threshold or variable threshold per country within some bandwidth.  A single threshold is necessary to simplify existing practices, avoid distortions in the Internal Market and facilitate compliance by citizens. However, it must be observed that a single threshold may not take into account the diverging purchasing powers, payments practices and availability of alternative payment means in the EU. Variable thresholds could be contemplated either directly through the EU initiative, or by setting a highest limit and allowing Member States to establish lower ones.

Application to all transactions or only to transactions including a business party or specific businesses. While applying restrictions to all transactions would constitute a significant simplification, current national practices often differentiate transactions between purely private persons, which are sometimes exempted of any restriction, and transactions that include one or more business parties, or specific business sectors.

Exemption of non-residents.  Because a restriction on cash transaction supposes the availability of alternatives means of payments, nonresidents are sometimes excluded from the restriction because they are deemed not to have easy access to the domestic banking system.

Alternative policy instrument

Restrictions on conducting large payments in cash could be advocated at EU level through a Commission recommendation. However, considering the existing divergences, it is doubtful that such recommendation would lead to an adoption of harmonised restrictions in all EU Member States. Self-regulation does not appear to be a viable option considering the objectives pursued (fight against criminality and terrorism). None of the participants to high value cash transactions would have any incentive to adopt such behaviour.

Alternative policy approach

Abolishing altogether the use of cash would reach the objective pursued, but would lack any proportionality since cash payments still constitute a major mean of payments firmly grounded in every day's life, for which alternatives have all some drawback, in particular for smaller payments. Compatibility of such abolition with current Treaties could also be challenged. Restrictions on large payments in cash could also be pursued by withdrawing the availability of high denomination banknotes, which facilitate the conduct of large cash payments. The ECB has already decided to progressively phase out the €500 banknote. But as long as cash exists, large payments will remain possible even with lower denomination banknotes, which only render the transaction more cumbersome, but not impossible.

Options that take account of new technological developments

In view of the development of cryptocurrencies and the existence of other means of payments ensuring anonymity, an option could be to extend the restrictions to cash payments to all payments ensuring anonymity (cryptocurrencies, payment in kinds, etc.). On the other hand, restrictions on cash payments could promote the development of alternative payments technologies compatible with the non-anonymity objective pursued.

Preliminary proportionality check

No preliminary check has been done as there isn’t a previous legislative measure on this issue.

C-  Preliminary Assessment of Expected Impacts

Likely economic impacts

The proposal should not produce any visible global macroeconomic impact. Some specific sectors, relying significantly on cash payments, could be more impacted, although it is difficult to assess whether the impact will be permanent or whether the introduction of restriction will just lead to adapting practices. It has to be noted that the restriction would not apply below the threshold and would thus not affect small traders. The introduction of harmonised EU wide restrictions should prevent the distortions of competition (uneven playing field) occurring when restrictions exist only in some Member States and affect businesses unevenly within the internal market. Regarding the fiscal policy, the likely positive impact on money laundering and tax fraud is expected to be positive by increasing fiscal revenues.

Likely social impacts

Receipts of payments in cash constitute a cost-free and credit-risk store of value facilitating people to buy goods of high value such as cars. Similarly, relying on cash has been shown to limit the risk of excessive spending and indebtedness. A proposal in this area would also contribute, together with other policies against organised crime, terrorism and terrorism financing, to the security of European citizens and the European society as a whole.

Likely environmental impacts

None

Likely impacts on fundamental rights

While being allowed to pay in cash does not constitute a fundamental right, the objective of the initiative, which is to prevent the anonymity that cash payments allow, might be viewed as an infringement of the right to privacy enshrined in Article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. However, as complemented by Article 52 of the Charter, limitations may be made subject to the principle of proportionality if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. The objectives of potential restrictions to cash payments could fit such description. It should also be observed that national restrictions to cash payments were never successfully challenged based on an infringement to fundamental rights.

Likely impacts on simplification and/or administrative burden

Approximating restrictions at EU level will remove the burden of having to comply with diverging national legislations.

D-  Data Collection and Better Regulation Instruments

Impact assessment

An impact assessment is being prepared to support the preparation of this initiative and to inform the Commission's decision. The following DGs will be invited :

o DG ECFIN

o DG HOME

o DG JUST

o DG FISMA

o DG TAXUD

o SJ

o SG

o DG CNECT

o DG GROW

Data collection

Data on legitimate and illegitimate use of cash should ideally be collected to substantiate the need of the initiative. Such information will most certainly come from law enforcement authorities and Europol. However, it should be understood that, like for all underground and criminal activities, information will not be easily available, and rough estimates might have to be used. The initiative will also build on existing evaluations, in particular from a law enforcement perspective. The most relevant evidence is contained in the Europol report "Why is cash still king?"6 . Other sources include the various studies, reports and documents conducted and published by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the regional body, Moneyval7.

Consultation strategy

The affected stakeholders are :

· law enforcement, custom and tax authorities, whose action is affected by the use of cash, which allows the hiding of financial transactions,

· central banks, as the issuers of cash and beneficiaries of seigniorage income,

· businesses and citizens would be impacted by a restriction on cash payments because cash remains a significant mean of payments for both citizens and businesses.

In order to explore the relevance of potential upper limits to cash payments, the Commission carried out three informal surveys: one addressed to national authorities taking stock in some detail on the existing restrictions to cash payments at national level and why these were introduced, one addressed to law enforcement authorities on the issue of crime prevention and enforceability, and a third one on the views of the private sector and businesses. The latter one was not exhaustive, as only a selected number of stakeholders deemed potentially most affected were targeted. A wide-ranging open online public consultation should also be carried out to give all stakeholders the opportunities to express their view. The launch of this consultation will be announced on the 'Your Voice in Europe website' (http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/consultations/index_en.htm).

Will an Implementation plan be established ?

Depending on the complexity of the final proposal and the legal instrument used, an implementation plan might be established.

(End of the .pdf)

NOTES :

* Source : http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/roadmaps/docs/plan_2016_028_cash_restrictions_en.pdf

1. Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community, OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 9.

2. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC, OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p.73.

3. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2016/html/pr160504.en.html 

4. http://ftp.iza.org/dp8402.pdf, http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/viewArticle/1169.

5. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/methodsandtrends/documents/ml-through-physical-transportation-of-cash.html.

6. https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/why-cash-still-king-strategic-report-use-cash-criminal-groups-facilitator-moneylaundering

7. The Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism – (Moneyval) is a permanent monitoring body of the Council of Europe.

Re-AJOUT au 07 août 2017
Publiée le 04 mars 2017 (10:38) vo.de w. trad-fr ''Ce qui se cache derrière l'abolition de l'argent liquide''

More posts from Klagemauer.tv 

auf .DE : https://www.kla.tv/ and more languages available...

en .FR : https://www.kla.tv/fr 

in .EN : https://www.kla.tv/en 

AJOUT le 7 août 2017
Publiée le 10 mars 2016 (08:40) vo.fr  ''Ténèbres. L'effondrement de l'euro et la mise en place de la monnaie unique'' 

AJOUT le 7 août 2017 (3:17) vo.de w. trad. fr. ''L'abolition de l'argent liquide approche : les épargnants doivent être dépossédés''

Nature, When the weather becomes mad, Nov. 2016

Ça s'est passé en Novembre 2016
It's happened in November 2016...

Route emportée par la mer
en Gaspésie (Québec, Canada), 2016

With liberal elites going into meltdown last month over 'Trumpocalypse', the stewards of empire are rapidly losing whatever grip they once had on reality. 

At the same time, with extreme weather event after extreme weather event impacting every region on Earth, it's as if this descent into madness is being marked every step of the way by Mother Nature. 

Disastrous climatic events in November 2016 included : 

• Snow, hail and flooding in the deserts of Saudi Arabia (again) 
• New Zealand's second strongest tremor in the modern era 
• Johannesburg's worst flash-flood in living memory 
• Another powerful quake (and another tsunami) off Fukushima, Japan 
• Outbreak of  'thunder asthma' in Melbourne, Australia, which killed 8 people and sent another 8500 to hospital 
• The latest Atlantic Hurricane in the modern era (and the most southerly, and the first to ever make landfall in Costa Rica) 
• Unprecedented 'superfires' torching swathes of the US Southeast. 

Those are just some of the more 'unusual' events in our latest Earth Changes Summary video, which also includes the other more 'normal' stuff : 

• Monster sinkholes swallowing multiple cars, people and homes  
• Deluges washing away more homes, cars and people 
• Massive meteor fireballs panicking people into thinking aliens have invaded  
• Destructive tornadoes touching down in the capitals of Rome and South Africa  
• Record November snowfalls in parts of northern US, northern China, and northern Europe... 

We are, of course, being facetious. There's nothing normal about any of this. We've entered a new global climate. Forecasting models are largely redundant at this point. 

The costs from all this destruction pile up ever higher with each passing month. Until now, elites have either ignored the climate/planetary upheaval, or blamed ordinary people for causing one or another symptom, then carried on milking taxpayers and spreading wars. 

No doubt, given recent patterns, they're soon going to start blaming it all on Putin. 

These were (some of) 'the signs' in November 2016... 

Publiée le 17 déc. 2016 (23:27) vo.eng "SOTT Earth Changes Summary - November 2016" 

FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.

Nature, Météo planétaire en Octobre 2016

Ça s’est passé en Octobre 2016

It happened in October 2016…

English version below the video

Alors que le mois dernier tous les yeux étaient rivés sur les développements de la plus extraordinaire élection étasunienne, les changements terrestres se sont allègrement poursuivis.

En octobre 2016, le prélude a été l'ouragan Matthew qui a engendré toute une série de destructions à travers la Colombie, les Caraïbes et la côte est étasunienne. La plus forte tempête de l'Atlantique Nord en une décennie, Matthew a également été la plus forte tempête jamais enregistrée si près de l'équateur, déversant tant d'eau qu'il a brisé les records de pluie partout où il est allé, et a coûté plus de dix milliards de dollars en dommages. Haïti, où plus de mille six cents personnes ont été tuées, en a été la principale victime. 

La météorologie extrême est tellement « la norme » maintenant que la Caroline du Sud aux États-Unis a enregistré le mois dernier sa septième inondation « millénaire » en seulement six ans, en battant des records de précipitations datant de... septembre 2016. Alors qu'une grande partie des États-Unis ont enregistré des températures records de chaleur pour un mois d'octobre, des quantités abondantes de neige à travers la Russie ont signifié que l'étendue de la couverture neigeuse de l'hémisphère nord à la fin octobre arrivait en seconde position seulement par rapport à celle enregistrée en 1976. 

Nous avons également observé une douzaine d'hallucinantes explosions météoriques dans la vidéo de ce mois, un reflet de ce que nous soupçonnons être une autre augmentation « des visiteurs de l'espace » qui s'accélère en fin d'année. Comme nous l'avons signalé au début de l'année, les boules de feu météoriques ont considérablement augmenté au cours de la dernière décennie, et les cieux deviennent particulièrement « éclairés » au cours de la deuxième moitié de chaque année. 

C'étaient « les signes » pour octobre 2016. 

Publiée le 28 nov. 2016 (23:31) vo.en w. s.-t.fr «Résumé SOTT – Octobre 2016 » 

ENGLISH 

While all eyes last month were on the most extraordinary build-up to a US election, Earth Changes continued apace. 

Crazy woman during the hurricane Matthew...

The curtain-raiser in October 2016 was Hurricane Matthew, which left a swathe of destruction across Colombia, the Caribbean and the US East Coast. The strongest North Atlantic storm in a decade, Matthew was also the strongest storm ever recorded so close to the equator, dumped so much water that it broke rainfall records wherever it went, and cost over $10 billion in damages. Haiti, where over 1 600 people were killed, bore the brunt of it. 

Extreme weather is so 'normal' now that South Carolina last month recorded its seventh '1-in-1,000-year' flood event in just 6 years, beating rainfall records set in... September 2016. While much of the US saw record-breaking warm temperatures for October, copious amounts of snow across Russia meant that the northern hemisphere's snow cover extent by late October was second only to that recorded in 1976. 

We also have a dozen mind-blowing meteor events in this month's video, a reflection of what we suspect is another end-of-year uptick in 'space visitors'. As we reported at the beginning of the year, fireballs have significantly increased over the last decade, and the skies become especially 'illuminated' during the latter half of each year. 

These were 'the signs' in October 2016... 

Publiée le 22 nov. 2016 (23:31) vo.eng "SOTT Earth Changes Summary - October 2016" 

FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.

Musique, L'artiste Moby dénonce la technologie

Le nouveau clip musical de l'artiste Moby

... décrit très bien la dépendance de l'espèce humaine aux technologies.

Moby sur Wiki (eng)

Oubliez le Moby aux airs planants1. 
L'artiste vient de sortir l'album "These Systems Are Failing" sous le nouveau nom de Moby & The Void Pacific Choir, et il est énervé. Très énervé. 
En atteste son dernier clip.2 

Pour le titre "Are You Lost in the World Like Me ?", le musicien électro a fait appel au célèbre illustrateur Steve Cutts3. En s'inspirant des dessins animés du studio Fleischer dans les années 30 (Betty Boop, Popeye et bien d'autres), Moby et Cutts dénoncent notre dépendance aux écrans.

"Pour moi, la vidéo parle de notre dépendance toujours croissante aux technologies, et des interactions entre les gens, ou plutôt de leur absence d'interactions. L'accent est mis sur le fait que la technologie nous affecte, nous désensibilise", explique Moby au sujet de ce clip. 

Ce regard sombre sur le monde est omniprésent dans son dernier album, sorti chez Because Music le 14 octobre.
"Nous avons construit de grandes cités. De grandes industries. De grands systèmes. Ces systèmes étaient censés nous protéger, nous rendre libres, mais au lieu de cela ils ont pollué notre air, tué les animaux, charcuté la terre – et nous ont détruits. Nous pensions avoir résolu les problèmes de production alimentaire et de distribution des richesses, mais nous sommes plus malheureux que jamais", écrit le végétarien pour présenter cet album aux influences punk, post-punk, et new-wave.

"J'ai fait écouter cet album à des amis de l'industrie musicale et ils ont dit : 'Humm, c'est quand-même assez violent'. Donc je suis rentré et j'ai rajouté de la violence." Le ton est donné. 

NOTES : 

1. Moby on YT 

2. Le clip vidéo publié le 18 oct 2016 (3:15) vo.eng "Moby & The Void Pacific Choir - Are You Lost In The World Like Me (Official Video)"
3. Steve Cutts

AJOUT le 27 nov. 2016

Publiée le 22 nov. 2013 (4:04) "IDIOTS - iPhones parody" 

Nature, Météo planétaire en Septembre 2016

Ça s’est passé en Septembre 2016

It happened in September 2016…

Version française plus bas.

As the Empire crumples under its own hubris, and as the flames of discontent spread amid rumors of world war, planetary upheaval continues unabated. This month's Hurricane Matthew will probably be remembered as the year's worst storm event in the US (and elsewhere), but in September two other storms, Hermine and Julia - one of them Florida's first hurricane since 2005, and the other the first such storm to ever form directly over the Sunshine State - inundated the coastal US Southeast.

A series of cyclones also brought wave after wave of flooding to southeastern Australia, breaking rainfall records dating back to the country's foundation in the 19th century, and bringing the country as a whole its third wettest winter on record. Meanwhile multiple typhoons in the northwest Pacific battered the Philippines, Taiwan, China, Korea and Japan. 50% stronger today than 40 years ago, the strongest of these cyclonic storms - Category 5 Meranti - was the strongest anywhere in the world so far this year, and second only to 2013's Typhoon Haiyan in the record books.

In addition to the walls of water brought by these large storms, local downbursts brought record-breaking rainfall, causing severe flash-flooding that washed away cars, homes and people in parts of the US, Mexico, Tunisia, Greece, Turkey, Ukraine, India, Indonesia, and China. Oklahoma, which never experienced earthquakes until recently, last month felt its strongest yet. A record-strong earthquake also hit South Korea, while a strong quake in Skopje, Macedonia, damaged buildings and sent residents into panic.

Multiple volcanic eruptions, mass fish kills, whale beachings and meteor fireball events round off another eventful month of Earth Changes...

Publiée le 11 oct. 2016 (22:00) vo.eng "SOTT Earth Changes Summary - September 2016"  

FRANÇAIS. 

Tandis que l'Empire s'effondre sous son propre orgueil et que les étincelles du mécontentement se répandent au milieu des rumeurs de guerre mondiale, le bouleversement planétaire se poursuit sans relâche. L'ouragan du mois Matthew restera probablement dans les mémoires comme le pire cas de tempête de l'année aux États-Unis (et ailleurs), mais Hermine et Julia - deux autres tempêtes de ce mois de septembre - ont inondé le littoral du sud-est des États-Unis. L'une d'entre elles était le premier ouragan en Floride depuis 2005, et l'autre la première tempête à jamais se former directement sur le Sunshine State (surnom de la Floride). 

Une série de cyclones a également apporté des vagues d'inondations dans le sud-est de l'Australie, battant des records de précipitations remontant à la fondation du pays au 19e siècle, et amenant le pays dans son ensemble à son troisième record de l'hiver le plus humide. Pendant ce temps, plusieurs typhons dans le nord-ouest du Pacifique se sont abattus aux Philippines, à Taiwan, en Chine, en Corée et au Japon. Cinquante pour cent plus puissante aujourd'hui qu'il y a quarante ans, la plus importante de ces tempêtes cycloniques - de catégorie 5 et portant le nom de Meranti - fut jusqu'à présent la plus intense dans le monde cette année, et selon les livres des records, au deuxième rang derrière le typhon Haiyan de 2013. 

En plus des murs d'eau apportés par ces grandes tempêtes, des rafales descendantes locales ont apporté un record de précipitations, provoquant de graves inondations soudaines qui ont emporté les voitures, les maisons et les gens dans certaines parties des États-Unis,du Mexique, de la Tunisie, de la Grèce, de la Turquie, de l'Ukraine, de l'Inde, de l'Indonésie et de la Chine. L'Oklahoma aux États-Unis, qui n'avait jamais connu de tremblements de terre jusqu'à récemment, a pourtant ressenti la puissance de celui qui l'a frappée le mois dernier. Un tremblement de terre de puissance record a également frappé la Corée du Sud, tandis qu'à Skopje, en Macédoine, un violent séisme a endommagé les bâtiments et plongé les résidents dans la panique. 

Plusieurs éruptions volcaniques, des morts massives de poissons, des échouages ​​de baleines et des explosions de boules de feu météoriques complètent un mois riche en événements de changements terrestres... 

Publiée le 17 oct. 2016 (19:59) vo.eng s-t.fr "Résumé SOTT - Septembre 2016" 

;.

FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also: Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.

Nature, Météo planétaire en Août 2016

Ça s'est passé en Août 2016 

It happened in August 2016...

While TV audiences were distracted by the Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro and the farcical build-up to the US presidential election, the relentless pace of increasing extreme weather events around the world continued in August. Among the trends in environmental upheaval in August, we observed :

• A record-breaking number of tornadoes in the US for August,
• Another "1-in-1 000-year flood event", this time in Louisiana, 

  

  Fire Tornado...

• A destructive earthquake in central Italy,
• The fastest comet ever recorded,
• Lots more lightning deaths, including an entire herd of reindeer in southern Norway,
• Three massive sinkholes opening up to swallow (and kill) people in China,
• Intense storms hitting many world capitals, including record rainfalls in Macedonia and Moscow,
• Raging wildfires across the western Mediterranean and western US...

These were just some of the signs in August 2016.

Publiée le 12 sept. 2016 (22:10) vo.eng "SOTT Earth Changes Summary - August 2016" 

En français 

Alors que les téléspectateurs ont été distraits par les Jeux olympiques d'été à Rio de Janeiro et la montée en puissance de la farce de l'élection présidentielle étasunienne, le rythme implacable de l'augmentation des phénomènes météorologiques extrêmes dans le monde a continué en août. Parmi les tendances dans les bouleversements environnementaux, le mois dernier, nous avons observé : 

• Un nombre record de tornades aux États-Unis pour un mois d'août, 
• Une autre inondation « qui n'arrive qu'une fois tous les 1 000 ans », cette fois en Louisiane aux États-Unis,
• Un tremblement de terre destructeur dans le centre de l'Italie, 
• La comète la plus rapide jamais enregistrée, 
• Beaucoup plus de morts dus à la foudre, y compris un troupeau entier de rennes dans le sud de la Norvège, 
• Trois dolines massives qui s'ouvrent pour avaler (et tuer) les gens en Chine, 
• De fortes tempêtes qui frappent de nombreuses capitales dans le monde, y compris des précipitations record en Macédoine et à Moscou, 
• Des feux de forêt intenses à travers l'ouest des États-Unis et l'ouest de la Méditerranée... 

Ce sont quelques-uns des signes d'août 2016. 

Publiée le 18 sept. 2016 (22:10) vo.eng s-t.fr "Résumé SOTT - Août 2016"

[FAIR USE NOTICE : We do not claim ownership of the footage contained in this mash-up video. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this video and SOTT Media channel is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. DMCA Takedowns and other copyright claims are HARASSMENT when initiated by a copyright holder for the purpose of using their copyright to infringe upon the Constitutional Rights of others (see also : Bill of Rights, US Constitution) by way of malicious attacks and are in direct violation of Fair Use Law.]